General Motors (GM), the third-largest U.S. advertiser will continue to spend roughly US$30 million (includes spend on multiple
ad agencies that create and manage content) on maintaining its “free” presence
on Facebook through pages and content but GM announced pull back of US$10
million spend in paid ads from Facebook. GM’s Facebook spend is minuscule compared to its $1.1 billion
spend on U.S.
ads in 2011 and it’s spend of about $271 million (25% -30% of total ad spend)
on online display and search ads excluding Facebook advertising. The reason for
stopping paid ads on Facebook is due to the little impact that paid ads are having on consumer’s purchase of cars but GM said it will continue
to promote its products on Facebook, but without paying Facebook. GM’s decision
will also not have major affect on Facebook ad revenues as Facebook's 2011 advertising
sales revenue was around US$3.15 billion and revenue from GM was tiny. Another
reason for GM cutting down its Facebook paid ads spend is because of the restructuring
of GM’s marketing operations for reducing billions of dollars in marketing costs
and targeting to save US$2bn over
the next five years. Some people believe GM did not believe in the
effectiveness of advertising on social networking sites and it is using
traditional measurement tools to measure the effectiveness of social media ads
which is not convincing as GM being a top ad spender knows how to measure
effectiveness.
According to some sources
Facebook has to blame itself for GM pull back of paid ads on its site as Facebook officials' failed to convince top
marketing executives at GM of the benefits of paid ads at a meeting that was held couple of
weeks before GM’s paid ads pull back announcement. Moreover Facebook officials
emphasized the advantages and impact of free posted content on their website
which made paid ads spend unnecessary and also suggested GM cut down its number
of ad agencies it engaged to manage its ad spend and content on Facebook. Facebook's
"click-through rate", also known as "clicks per page view,"
is half the average for ads on the Internet and the average targeted ad on the
Internet is "clicked" on by a consumer once every 1,000 times it is
viewed while Google's is 4 in 1,000 according to Larry Kim, founder & CTO
of Internet ad consultant Wordstream. Google AdSense ads are more effectively
targeted than Facebook ads and GM preferred to stick with them. GM spent more
money on creating and managing content rather than advertising and the ratio of
spend is $3 on brand pages for every $1 on paid ads. Also Facebook is expected to increase its ad rates
after the IPO. Facebook sells ads for brand pages, sponsored posts that
appear on user’s news feeds, and other formats like called "sponsored
stories," that allows advertisers to pay to republish positive Facebook
messages that people had posted about their brand.
But the fact is Facebook is struggling
to develop a scalable revenue
generator like Google AdSense and in the past few years Facebook attempts for
successful ad model for marketers and businesses included charging marketers to
host brand pages, featured banners ads on pages from MSN ad networks and Facebook
Beacon system, that sent data from external websites to Facebook, for the
purpose of allowing targeted advertisements and allowing users to share their
activities with their friends. In March 2012, Facebook announced Premium,
a new suite of products for marketers designed to leverage the social network’s
access to friends and friends of friends. Facebook has been gradually
increasing its ad revenues and recommends to marketers that unpaid content like
brand pages and building a base of online fans who like a brand is successful
and users will know about the unpaid content easily only when paired with paid
advertisements like display ads and its "sponsored stories." Facebook
said in March, for example, that only 16% of a brand's fans will see a post
about the brand without paying. Facebook will use technology to ensure that the
Paid ad is seen by 75% of those who click a company's "like" button
on its website. Another problem area for Facebook is the mobile platform as
most of its users are logging in to the site through their mobiles and the
company doesn’t have a viable business model to generate revenues on the mobile
devices. Facebook need to convince the marketers and businesses about paid ads,
their effectiveness and also need to develop a measurement tool for measuring
the effectiveness and reach of the ads that is as simple to use as TV ratings.
Facebook has more than 900 million
users as of March 2012 and businesses cannot ignore such a huge platform for
promoting their products and services. Realizing this fact many businesses
across the globe spent millions of dollars and hired digital ad firms for creating
content for their Facebook pages in order to stimulate buzz, which advertisers
liken to word-of-mouth marketing campaigns. GM decision of cutting its Facebook
paid ads spend is not a permanent decision and the company plans to revive it’s
spend once it feels the Facebook ads are effective and reach the targeted customer
who will spend in buying cars. GM is not alone in this regards as some of the
companies too are apprehensive as quoted by Forrester analysts in their blog
post. Businesses, Marketers and Analysts are all demanding Facebook to improve
its paid advertising model, make its platform more attractive and post IPO the
shareholders are also looking for significant improvement in the company
revenues and business model which will increase the profitability. According to
Facebook most of the businesses and marketers are still learning and experimenting with the best ways to
leverage Facebook to create more social and valuable ads. Some of the GM
competitors like Ford are supporting Facebook as they are effectively using the
site for various promotional activities but Facebook needs to focus on
improving its business model and ad platforms to attract more businesses and
make sure that more businesses follow General Motors suit calling it an ineffective
platform.
No comments:
Post a Comment